makardhswd
Monday, April 15, 2013
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Today I searched through the websites for both the Louvre as well as the British Museum. I personally believe that both websites were well made and easy to navigate, but I do believe that the Louvre has a more attractive site.
What is the best part of the website? The worst? For the Louvre, the best part of the website was the fact that it was so easy to navigate. I didn't have to spend hours upon hours trying to locate the museum's schedule, or find out what exhibits are on display. And as for the worst part of the Louvre's site, it'd have to be the logo up in the top left corner. And that's just my own personal distaste for the Louvre's logo. And as for the British museum, I felt like the three main "topics" and task bar were easy to navigate. However the British museum's website had far too much white pace which I felt made the website look cluttered.
Is the website accessible for all people (sight impaired, hearing impaired)?
Not really, and that's a major downside. It'd be very difficult for a blind person to search the louvre's and British Museum's websites. But a deaf person could easily do so.
What kinds of exhibits are displayed currently at the museum, and what kind of online components (educational, links, images) are available if any?
Currently both museums have numerous galleries and exhibits up and the Louvre has just opened up their Islamic art exhibition. Online neither museum has very much; the British museum has a tab dedicated to online gallery tours. Both museums also have dedicated youth and student tabs and options.
What could each learn from the other to make their websites better?
The British museum should definitely learn from the Louvre and fill the copious amounts of white space with SOMETHING. The Louvre on the other hand, should take a page from the Brits and change the stupid logo.
In conclusion, I feel that the Louvre has a beautiful, top quality site. It's easy to navigate, easy to understand, and just looks fantastic. The british museum has a decent quality site as well. Navigation is easy, and content is spot on. Again it's just the white space tat drives me nuts.
(http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/explore_introduction.aspx)
(http://www.louvre.fr/llv/oeuvres/alaune.jsp?bmLocale=en)
What is the best part of the website? The worst? For the Louvre, the best part of the website was the fact that it was so easy to navigate. I didn't have to spend hours upon hours trying to locate the museum's schedule, or find out what exhibits are on display. And as for the worst part of the Louvre's site, it'd have to be the logo up in the top left corner. And that's just my own personal distaste for the Louvre's logo. And as for the British museum, I felt like the three main "topics" and task bar were easy to navigate. However the British museum's website had far too much white pace which I felt made the website look cluttered.
Is the website accessible for all people (sight impaired, hearing impaired)?
Not really, and that's a major downside. It'd be very difficult for a blind person to search the louvre's and British Museum's websites. But a deaf person could easily do so.
What kinds of exhibits are displayed currently at the museum, and what kind of online components (educational, links, images) are available if any?
Currently both museums have numerous galleries and exhibits up and the Louvre has just opened up their Islamic art exhibition. Online neither museum has very much; the British museum has a tab dedicated to online gallery tours. Both museums also have dedicated youth and student tabs and options.
What could each learn from the other to make their websites better?
The British museum should definitely learn from the Louvre and fill the copious amounts of white space with SOMETHING. The Louvre on the other hand, should take a page from the Brits and change the stupid logo.
In conclusion, I feel that the Louvre has a beautiful, top quality site. It's easy to navigate, easy to understand, and just looks fantastic. The british museum has a decent quality site as well. Navigation is easy, and content is spot on. Again it's just the white space tat drives me nuts.
(http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/explore_introduction.aspx)
(http://www.louvre.fr/llv/oeuvres/alaune.jsp?bmLocale=en)
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Great Burger Places
I am going to tell you about six amazing burger places back in the states. Culver's, In-N-Out, Steak N' Shake, Sonic, Smashburger, and five guys. These are some of the best burgers I've ever eaten, and places that I would highly recommend to anyone and everyone. I could tell you all about their greatness, but a picture's worth a thousand words, so look at these.


Sunday, March 3, 2013
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<h1>InFamous series PS3</h1>
<p>InFamous and InFamous 2 are open word action adventure games created by Sucker Punch exclusively for the Playstation 3 .In Infamous, the player controls the protagonist Cole MacGrath, a bike messenger caught in the center of an explosion that devastates several city blocks of the fictional Empire City. The explosion sends the city into chaos while Cole finds himself with new electricity-based super powers. As players progress through the story and master coles powers, the gam'es karma system presents them with choices between good and evil, and whichever karmic choice is made will either unlock or lockout different powers and side missions. In InFamous 2 the story continues with an all new location, all new melee combat system, and all new fire and ice based powers to be used in conjunction with Cole's preexisting electrical powers. InFamous 3, Second Son will be released for the Playstation 4 sometime in 2014 ad will feature all new smoke based powers, all new locations and an all new protagonist; Delsin Rowe</p>
<img>http://otakugambit.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/closing-thoughts.jpg</img>
<img>https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/G/01/videogames/detail-page/infamous2.02.lg.jpg</img>
<img>http://uk.playstation.com/media/142220/infamous_hero.jpg</img>
<img>http://www.gamerdna.com/uimage/x671mRPV/full/infamous-screenshot.jpg</img>
<img>http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_content_width/hash/d4/ce/d4ce4fe981193dbe811be81b98bb1855.jpg</img>
</body>
</html>
InFamous series PS3
InFamous and InFamous 2 are open word action adventure games created by Sucker Punch exclusively for the Playstation 3 .In Infamous, the player controls the protagonist Cole MacGrath, a bike messenger caught in the center of an explosion that devastates several city blocks of the fictional Empire City. The explosion sends the city into chaos while Cole finds himself with new electricity-based super powers. As players progress through the story and master coles powers, the gam'es karma system presents them with choices between good and evil, and whichever karmic choice is made will either unlock or lockout different powers and side missions. In InFamous 2 the story continues with an all new location, all new melee combat system, and all new fire and ice based powers to be used in conjunction with Cole's preexisting electrical powers. InFamous 3, Second Son will be released for the Playstation 4 sometime in 2014 ad will feature all new smoke based powers, all new locations and an all new protagonist; Delsin Rowe





Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)








